 | | Re: Question on 8277 Inventory
|
|
Robert Munafo wrote in message ... (...) this: (...) ... (...) ... (...) sub-box (...) the (...) the (...) inventory (...) I'd say no, there's no standard. For my inventories, I just count the parts for the whole set. That's the compromise I made a (...) (26 years ago, 19-Nov-99, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Question on 8277 Inventory
|
|
I ran into that problem too, and the solution I came up with looks like this: 7171 Names: Mos Espa Podrace Inventory: by "John Cromer" <cro@astro.caltech.edu> Count Color ---ID--- Description 1 n/a 7171-sa1 Subassembly box, Anakin's Podracer (...) (26 years ago, 18-Nov-99, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Question on 8277 Inventory
|
|
I have a quick question on how to inventory set 8277, the Giant Model Set. Since the set contains a sub-box should the pieces in this box be inventoried seperately from the rest of the box? If so, what should designate these pieces as still coming (...) (26 years ago, 17-Nov-99, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Set 6457 Astronaut Figure
|
|
This is my first go at an inventory. I chose this set because it's so small and I couldn't find it anywhere else. Comments, critique or any other feedback welcome. I intend to post some other sets (mostly Star Wars: Snowspeeder, Landspeeder, etc.) (...) (26 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Classic Set 4291
|
|
Here's the contents of the Classic tub 4291, discussed in loc.ca. 1x1 brick black 12 1x1 brick blue 28 1x1 brick red 28 1x1 brick white 28 1x1 brick yellow 28 1x1 brick w/side stud red 4 1x1 brick, printed yellow 2 1x1 round brick grey 6 1x2 brick (...) (26 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Standardized Inventory File Format?
|
|
Hi, I'm new here but I live in database land. The work already put into the CAD program inventories should not be underestimated. For your text file format, use columns, use tabs or commas for delimiters. People should be able and expected to enter (...) (27 years ago, 14-Oct-99, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Inventories
|
|
(...) Well, it's not trying to yet...that part is still a ways out. (...) Right. That interface was a quick prototype and an experiment to get the feel of cross-referencing hops between different object types. It was never meant as anything but a (...) (27 years ago, 10-Oct-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Inventories
|
|
(...) Well, there are several reasons I am not going to do that. First off is that I know how to program Access. Those who know how to program other systems have not put forth the time to make one in their programming language of choice, so I will (...) (27 years ago, 10-Oct-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
