 | | Re: Peeron Guidelines
|
| (...) I'd like to echo the above sentiments. Most of us are unlikely to find MISB sets from 1980, but it would still be nice to have an inventory. . .and know that the inventory was not as reliable as one from an MISB set. (For example, I bought a (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-01, to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Peeron Guidelines
|
| (...) Samuel, this a really important point. A great number of the inventories at Peeron are converted from other sources, and some are from years ago when world-wide AR levels were not as high, so it'd be nice to know just how much accuracy you can (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
| | | | | Re: Easiest way to get an inventory
|
| (...) For sets with a high percentage of normal-type pieces, I use ML-CAD - if there are instructions I'll build it, approximating position to save time, or for freestyle and the like, just a grid of pieces with multiples stacked. I have a horror of (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
| | | | | Re: Easiest way to get an inventory
|
| (...) Yeah, I have been doing them manually, too. A ton of parts lookups in partsref, let me tell you... I like databases since I can work with the keyboard and forget the mouse so I create inventories as a database (.dbf) and then save again as (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
| | | | | Peeron Guidelines
|
| I realize this isn't supposed to be a discussion forum, but I'm not clear on where else to put something like this. I am wondering if it would be possible to mark up inventories with some verification data. For instance, with some inventories (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
|
