 | | Re: Proposal: New Part Numbering System
|
|
(...) I agree. Ask the question first, explain the benefit to the community, and hope for the answer we are looking for. It would seem to me that if the information is available on larger parts for public consumption, surely they would not maintain (...) (21 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Part Numbering System
|
|
(...) I asked italy@lego.com for the index number on the sticker sheet in 6970 after I hadn't got reply on this post: (URL) was told (in a very friendly way) that all information regarding discontinued sets has been destroid. (...) billund calling (...) (21 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Part Numbering System
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes: Hi Steve I applaud the efforts you, Dan and Jennifer are putting forward to making this work. This might seem like a silly question - but has anyone asked LEGO for the missing part numbers. As LEGO molds the (...) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Part Numbering System
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote in message ... (...) It's my understanding that Bricklink has been hoping for part number synchronization for a while - there has been a good deal of discussion of it recently and they seem to have given up on the possibility. (...) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Part Numbering System
|
|
Yay! Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) SPAM when e-mailing) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Proposal: New Part Numbering System
|
|
Hi! I've been talking with Dan and Jennifer Boger tonight, trying to figure out how we can improve the synchroni[s|z]ation between LDraw and Peeron part numbers. And anyone else's part system that wants to play with us, too. :) Basically, there are (...) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary) !!
|
| |
| | Re: New set 10045 - Bridge Elements
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) Interesting how they name this - it's actually 10 studs long, but the lattice section is 2x6x1.2/3, with a 2x2x2/3 section at each end to use for attachment. I hope the part is given the dimensions 2x10x1.2/3 in Ldraw... ROSCO (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jan-03, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular 3L
|
|
(...) Why not 6536 : Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular 2L - Axle/Pin32291 : Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular 2L Double - Axle/Pin+Pin Chris (21 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular 3L
|
|
I have to question calling any of these an "axle joiner". They bear no resemblance in appearance or function to the basic Technic Axle Joiner 6538, which is actually designed to join two axles together rigidly. None of these "axle joiner (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular 3L
|
|
It's also related to 6536 "Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular" and 32291 "Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular Double". How about "Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular Double (Inline)"? --Bill. (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
