Subject:
|
Re: LEGO Inside Tour (New theory on color change: stock dyes)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.color
|
Date:
|
Sun, 22 Aug 2004 16:37:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
837 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.color, Ross Crawford wrote:
| |
Well unfortunately, those 2 paragraphs are somewhat contradictory. If LEGO is
“a big enough company that if it wants a RGB mix of whatever, it would be
able to source it”, then why couldn’t they source consistent purple dyes,
even in different countries?
|
I think the difference there is that James was saying that it doesn’t make sense
that they’d be unable to find someone who would agree to supply dye for the old
grey/brown colors at all. The purple fiasco was a wholy different situation.
They did find different companies that agreed to supply them with the same color
of dye, but for whatever reason the end results didn’t live up to the promises
that had been made. There’s a difference between being flat-out refused and
being given false promises.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LEGO Inside Tour (New theory on color change: stock dyes)
|
| (...) Well unfortunately, those 2 paragraphs are somewhat contradictory. If LEGO is "a big enough company that if it wants a RGB mix of whatever, it would be able to source it", then why couldn't they source consistent purple dyes, even in different (...) (20 years ago, 22-Aug-04, to lugnet.color, FTX)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
