Subject:
|
Not convinced that money wasn't the reason (was: Color Change background)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.color
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 May 2004 04:33:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
834 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.color, Eric Kingsley wrote:
| |
I think all I can add is that LEGO should not hide behind the “more
consistant color pallet” excuse when (...)
|
I visited a friend in another state this past weekend, and we got to
talking about the color change. To paraphrase what he said:
“The reason has to be money. Purely money, nothing else. They’re a
business. They’d be idiots if it were any other reason besides money. Do you
know how expensive a color change like this is? They wouldn’t be doing it
unless they were sure that it would save them money.”
This got me to wondering: Why has Mega-Bloks gray always been so blay?
Is blay cheaper than gray? Why on God’s Green Earth would Mega-Bloks
choose not to color-match classic LEGO gray unless it were cheaper to
make it blay instead? Hmmmmmm.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Color Change background
|
| (...) Well I can say that my involvement in the hobby has been reduced almost totally to my local club (same one as Chris'). I will probably still make PAB purchases and get the Maersk Ship. I was going to get several of the Knight Buses until the (...) (20 years ago, 17-May-04, to lugnet.color)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
