 | | ... and a bad, bad new year! Burkhard Schloemer
|
| | | "Let me openly state that had the decision makers in this color change process been aware of the negative impact on the AFOLs at the time the decision was made, these three colors would not have been changed." Just in case someone missed this (...) (21 years ago, 8-Mar-05, to lugnet.color)
|
| | | |
| | |  | | Re: ... and a bad, bad new year! Scott Lyttle
|
| | | | | (snip) (...) (snip) (...) Where has LEGO officially stated color standards? All I'm aware of is part compatibilty standards. I understand your love and appreciation with the elements, but it's like having a sibling--you have to take the good with (...) (21 years ago, 8-Mar-05, to lugnet.color)
|
| | | | | |
| | |  | | Re: ... and a bad, bad new year! Jeff Shiner
|
| | | | | (...) Personally I think you are being exactly that. Wishing that the Lego company does poorly is very selfish. I see very little good that can come from continued financial troubles and may serve to hurt existing and next generation Lego fans who (...) (21 years ago, 8-Mar-05, to lugnet.color)
|
| | | | | |
| | |  | | Re: ... and a bad, bad new year! Kelly McKiernan
|
| | | | (...) - snip - (...) If enough people decide to take that approach, it would ultimately be self-defeating. There wouldn't be a LEGO company around to produce new bricks in any color. Boycotting the company due to the color change is of course your (...) (21 years ago, 9-Mar-05, to lugnet.color)
|
| | | | |