 | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
I disagree with this letter. (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for discussion!
|
|
(...) Hey, Mark, I know that. And I didn't mean for my post to be a rally against you in particular at all, but rather just on the comment of the other hostilities, especially in the other thread that isn't supposed to have the discussions in it. (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.color)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
(...) I agree with the above letter and sign it Walter Walters (age 30), Pennsylvania (USA) approximate annual budget before 2004: $1500 approximate budget for 2004: $7 Total MSRP of LEGO sets that I own: pre-2004: $9,573 post-2004: $7 (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: An alternative open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
|
In lugnet.color, Thomas Stangl wrote: <snip> (...) True, but how much of that 5% actually cares about the color change enough to vocally protest? Based on the discussion here I'd well less than half and probably more like one tenth (and I think (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for discussion!
|
|
I like this wording better, it's much more positive, I'd sign it... But I stand by signing the original version - TLG needs a swift kick in the rear about now to knock some sense into it. (...) -- Tom Stangl *(URL) Visual FAQ home *(URL) Visual FAQ (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.color)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
Kevin, If you read the thread, they've already noted it was a mis-translation. (...) -- Tom Stangl *(URL) Visual FAQ home *(URL) Visual FAQ Home (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: An alternative open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
|
(...) Sure, and I have no problem with that. I DO have a problem with the suck-ups telling the people that are trying to tell TLC they made a mistake to keep quiet about it. Sucking up all the time with no dissent is a sure way to grenade a company (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: An alternative open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
|
(...) The tests they did simply could have been skewed by how the questions were asked. Without seeing the actual test, we won't know if they happened to use leading questions posed by the people for the color change, or hand-picked a strange group (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: An alternative open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
|
(...) And your actions, kissing their hindquarters vociferously, will somehow tell them when they might have done something that has upset their paying customers? ENOUGH of the puckering up, Bill. (...) 5% is 5%. If you as a CEO piss off 5% of your (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
I agree to returning to the old greys/browns (the new don't need to disappear, just bring back the old). Tom Stangl (38), Cantonment, Florida USA ~$10-20,000/yr 1997-2004 ~$200 post-2004 (on post-color-change sets. Still a few thousand on (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
