 | | Re: Color Change background
|
|
(...) Geez. That's a bit thick in my personal view. (snipped a lot of stuff in the same vein) (...) Yes, I think it *is* your error. You did "fail to notice"... Jake *explained* why the Design Lab felt there was a strong need to change things. You (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.color)
|
| |
| | Re: Color Change background
|
|
(...) "Sorry, I dropped your baby". It is *not* only the implementation. The whole idea was a stupid idea from the very beginning, and none of those in charge thought about the consequences of this first-grade mistake. The total failure of (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.color)
|
| |
| | Re: Color Change background
|
|
(...) Hi, Big thanks - I'm giving you 5 of 5 points for telling us the reasons. 1 of 5 points for it taking too long, though. I just hope that the persons which invented and approved these changes were already fired. Removing the backward (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.color)
|
| |
| | Re: Color Change background
|
|
(...) Jake, Thanks for coming through with this message. It's nice to have some knowledge of the process and history of the color change. <snip> (...) If possible, I would like to know more about the thinking that went into the tweaking process. Was (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.color, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Knight Bus problem
|
|
(...) Spotlighted! I hope this gets stoplighted enough so that people outside of the .color group can see it. It is sad to me that, basically, TLC is saying that the color variation is fine and that the bus is meant to be played with and the (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.color, FTX)
|
