Subject:
|
Re: Color Change background
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.color
|
Date:
|
Thu, 13 May 2004 16:12:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
748 times
|
| |
|
|
Jake McKee wrote:
> I don’t begin to think that we’ll never make another mistake again. After all,
> the company is made up of humans, and humans make mistakes. What I do hope you
> know, or agree is that we will do a better job of trying to ensure this type
> of
> situation doesn’t happen again.
Hi,
Big thanks - I'm giving you 5 of 5 points for telling us the reasons. 1
of 5 points for it taking too long, though.
I just hope that the persons which invented and approved these changes
were already fired. Removing the backward compatibility of >30years old
established system, on 2nd, 7th and 9th most used colors is not just a
'human mistake'. Change for a change is always bad.
I just don't think that 'one thing that Design Lab was unaware of was
the incredible impact on the AFOLs' is true. They were unaware of the
impact on _SYSTEM_ or worse, they haven't cared.
It's possible that SYSTEM means something different to LEGO today. With
emergence of Bionicle, Znap2 (new studless Technic) and Galidor which
are (mainly) non-SYSTEM (each to a different degree, of course) it seems
like it's true.
I don't like to sound that pessimistic, LEGO is still capable of doing
wonderful things (the Designer/Inventor sets), even some newer colors
(tan) and parts (all those new slopes and wedges) are great. But there
are moves I really don't understand (replacing hinges with biiig and
ugly click-hinges, for example).
--
Jindroush <jindroush@nospam.seznam.nospam.cz>
Remove both 'nospam's from the address to reply.
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
