 | | Re: Question on the IOM
|
| (...) Perhaps a lot more than people are needed for IOM to continue? I personally think more effort should be placed in the real-time scenerio compendium, an addition I proposed earlier, but nobody seemed to like (for some reason I don't know of) To (...) (22 years ago, 26-May-02, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
| | | | | Re: Question on the IOM
|
| Matt, I think your concept sounds like it could be fun. Why don't you start a website and run it? -Aaron "Matt Hein" <Pyrokid17@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Gwq9yA.983@lugnet.com... (...) taking (...) personally (...) use (...) the (...) (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-02, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
| | | | | Re: Question on the IOM
|
| (...) I joined IOM at about the same time that it died down, so my character is not even posted on the website. I think this project needs not only more people but more webmasters who can stand the "long-termity" of the project. Personally, if IOM (...) (22 years ago, 2-Mar-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
| | | | | Re: Question on the IOM
|
| (...) i, personally, was trying to think how to fit the IOM into Castlequest. CQ has its base in gaming, but it is meant to be like the iom, and castleworld. live long enough, you can have your very own city which you are gamemaster of. however, i (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
| | | | | Re: Question on the IOM
|
| (...) I don't think IOM could exist cocurrent with CQ. Since the two game styles are going to be so different, it would add too much confusion and plus the initial failure of IOM suggests that it probably wont stand up to another run. I think it is (...) (22 years ago, 5-Mar-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
| |
