 | | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) I disagree deeply here. I've talked a bit with anthony, and have read his posts closely. I think he has been working extensively to keep as many people in the mix as possible. Both him and I have been very open about our ideas about CW and (...) (23 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
Sava: One of my primary rules for CW is that you do not have any rights to my time. My own laziness is an issue that is being addressed with the new proposal that Pawel and I are working on. Why Pawel? Because it was his baby to begin with. Why not (...) (23 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) Richard, I'm sorry. This is not going to be a nice post. I've done my best to vent this elsewhere but I will not hold it back any longer. How much more slowly do you wish to go Richard? Look at the Castle World website. The last update was (...) (23 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations for the Castle World Committee
|
|
(...) I have an update on the part above. We have access to CW again. Many thanks, as always, to our gracious ozbricks hosts! Blame it on my poor record keeping and my glitchy firewall settings. Who knew?! -- Hop-Frog (23 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations for the Castle World Committee
|
|
All: We need to go a little more slowly on this stuff at the moment. There's some background issues that have come up and need to be resolved before moving forward. Whereas I thought the hosting issue was settled, I haven't been able to gain FTP (...) (23 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
