To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.castleOpen lugnet.castle in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Castle / 696
695  |  697
Subject: 
Re: 1680
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.castle
Date: 
Thu, 18 Nov 1999 20:53:54 GMT
Viewed: 
852 times
  
In lugnet.castle, Dan Moquin writes:
In lugnet.castle, Jonathan Wilson writes:
I checked my copy of the brickshelf.com instructions for 1877 and they
clearly show 3 different figs.

I just looked at the brickshelf instructions and they only show 2 minifigs.  I
also have this set with only two figs.

I'd say you are quite correct... I think Jonathan maybe counted the
picture of the building of the blue-collared minifig as a separate fig, which
it isn't.... unless he was referring to a different picture? He did say "I
checked *MY* copy of the brickshelf.com instructions..." does that mean you've
(JW) got a separate set of instructions? Or maybe you accidentally typed in
1680? oh.. wait... no, that's not even in the DB yet... umm.... ?

DaveE



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: 1680
 
(...) Yes. I accidently counted that picture. and Yes i do have a complete set of scanned instructions to almoast every castle set. I wish someone would scan the last remaining sets i need to complete the collection, though (stupid royal knights (...) (25 years ago, 18-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 1680
 
(...) one (...) fact, (...) removed. (...) clearly show (...) also have this set with only two figs. Dan M. (25 years ago, 18-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)

16 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR