 | | Re: 1680 —Tamyra Teed
|
| | | (...) Since I know my 1877 is still in it's box, I'm going to dig it out this weekend if I can find it easily.. for some reason I remember putting a fig in the "undercarriage" of the set, and it had to have come from the set because around that time (...) (25 years ago, 18-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 1680 —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | (...) I checked my copy of the brickshelf.com instructions for 1877 and they clearly show 3 different figs. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 18-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 1680 —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | (...) Funny, if it is set 1877, then it can't have three. It only came with two. I own the set, and I remember getting it. Mine only came with two. Are you sure you don't have 1680? Jeff (25 years ago, 18-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 1680 —Dan Moquin
|
| | | | (...) one (...) fact, (...) removed. (...) clearly show (...) also have this set with only two figs. Dan M. (25 years ago, 18-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 1680 —David Eaton
|
| | | | | (...) I'd say you are quite correct... I think Jonathan maybe counted the picture of the building of the blue-collared minifig as a separate fig, which it isn't.... unless he was referring to a different picture? He did say "I checked *MY* copy of (...) (25 years ago, 18-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 1680 —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes. I accidently counted that picture. and Yes i do have a complete set of scanned instructions to almoast every castle set. I wish someone would scan the last remaining sets i need to complete the collection, though (stupid royal knights (...) (25 years ago, 18-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 1680 —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | (...) My Mistake. The instructions were "cut" on the minifig section. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 18-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
