 | | Re: More news on 2000 lineup!
|
|
(...) I'm not trying to attempt a parallel. I know WW has nothing to do with sailing ships or pirates. You didn't understand what I tried to say. WW is as much NOT Pirates to me as Ninja is NOT Castle. (...) It's a Castle subtheme because Lego says (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: More news on 2000 lineup!
|
|
(...) I do understand what you are trying to say, I just don't see your logic as compelling in any way. (...) to (...) I've said a number of times this isn't about whether it sucks or doesn't suck. You said it isn't real Castles - that's all I'm (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: More news on 2000 lineup!
|
|
(...) Really? Wow. (...) Oh, ok. Well, like someone reminded me - you're entitled to your opinion. You're wrong, of course, but you're certainly entitled to to be wrong if you want to be. :) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: More news on 2000 lineup!
|
|
(...) Gosh, now I'm really impressed. Golly gee. (...) suck. (...) And....that's it? Not willing or simply unable to defend your opinion? Just a sneering dismissal? Perhaps you shouldn't be calling people "doofus", if that's the best you can muster. (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: More news on 2000 lineup!
|
|
Mike Stanley wrote in message ... (...) claim (...) parallel, (...) obvious to (...) is (...) I (...) When did Lego make such an announcement. As I recall, Ninja replaced Castle, but it was never said it was (or was not) the same theme), and we both (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: More news on 2000 lineup!
|
|
(...) I think you and I may be the only ones who caught onto the whole "silly" part... (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
