 | | Re: Royal Knights treasure Carrier 6044 and others
|
|
I think trade posts _are_ OK(ish). It is only auction posts which are a no-no (?). Scott A (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Royal Knights treasure Carrier 6044 and others
|
|
As I remember it.. if the Group charter agreed to allow some type of trading then it was ok.. I don't believe we have that understanding in .Castle, though I wouldn't mind if we did.. (Correct me on this if I'm wrong!) Though this isn't trade, this (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Royal Knights treasure Carrier 6044 and others
|
|
(...) The LUGNET Terms of Use Agreement, (URL) no requirement one way or the other regarding the place of regular sales postings. Only auctions are verboten by the LTUA. However, it's generally considered good netiquette not to spam theme groups (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet *another* inn update
|
|
(...) Nah... grey plates are castle related. Trust me. <grin> James (URL) getting paid for this --> alladvantage.com Sign up via me, the reference $$ go to fund Lugnet. (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Castle Jr. pros/cons (Re: What sucks)
|
|
(...) --snip-- (...) i'm going to agree and disagree with this. the whole negative thing toward jr. is that the parts LIMIT the builder's possibilities. take five 1x6x1 bricks versus one 1x6x5 wall element. between the two which will provide you (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
