 | | Its a Completely New Castle (was Re: Legend set of Royal Knight's Castle) —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | (...) Compare (URL) the new 10176> with (URL) the original 6090>. Clearly the new castle was merely inspired by the original. I am surprised S@H is even making the comparison. The new one actually looks much better from a design stand point. It also (...) (18 years ago, 30-Jun-06, to lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Its a Completely New Castle (was Re: Legend set of Royal Knight's Castle) —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, it's like they took 6090 and 6091/6098 and built some kind of combo castle with them. Comparing them is like saying that 6062 is a re-release of 6061. Same general idea, same general design, but made to be prettier and be more (...) (18 years ago, 30-Jun-06, to lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Its a Completely New Castle (was Re: Legend set of Royal Knight's Castle) —Stefan Gustavson
|
| | | | (...) Nothing more than sales expectations, but that is of course the main issue. It's pretty square-looking, takes a lot of patience to build and leaves a lot to the imagination. Patience and imagination are two qualities of which there seems to be (...) (18 years ago, 5-Jul-06, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Its a Completely New Castle (was Re: Legend set of Royal Knight's Castle) —Nathan Todd
|
| | | | (...) Not to bring up an old debate, but: They never really tried to sell the Legends, if you put the guarded inn in a decent box (what were they thinking with a black and white one?) and put it on a shelf next to a thrown together model like this (...) (18 years ago, 6-Jul-06, to lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
| | | | |
