Subject:
|
Re: Blue Dragon
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Tue, 10 Jun 2003 00:56:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
759 times
|
| |
| |
"Matt Hein" <Pyrokid17@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:HG67p6.11oM@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.announce.moc, Joe Comeau wrote:
>
> > I can't seem to stop building dragons for some reason. Anyway, here's my
> > latest, a blue dragon. He is by far the most articulate dragon so far:
>
> Whoa! Now that's one wicked design! Seriously, just after
> taking one look at It I found myself wondering whether it
> was a dragon, a mantis or a pterodactyl...honestly, I can't
> say for sure what exactly it is, but I guess I'll go with
> the dragon description.
Yeah, I haven't subscribed to any particular definition of a dragon other
than some sort of reptile that can fly, so his ambiguity isn't a surprise.
> Hey, I like the movement articulation using the hinges,
> but just about the only improvement here would be to add
> partial rotation to the arms and legs for extra posability.
>
> Still, this was an excellent approach.
Thanks! His arms do have pretty good articulation and can, in fact, make
circular motions. His legs are a completely different story. By giving the
legs more articulation, the easier it would be to balance him, which is a
good thing. Right now, there are only two of those half friction/half axle
pegs bearing the full weight. They do their job amazingly well, but I can
find a few positions where they just aren't enough to hold the position.
Definitely an area for improvement. Thanks for the feedback!
- Joe
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Blue Dragon
|
| (...) Whoa! Now that's one wicked design! Seriously, just after taking one look at It I found myself wondering whether it was a dragon, a mantis or a pterodactyl...honestly, I can't say for sure what exactly it is, but I guess I'll go with the (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jun-03, to lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|