 | | Re: roll call (27 more needed?)
|
|
(...) Alright, an addition already! (...) .castle has been really slow with postings lately, which was a surprise to me. Then again, at least we can be thankful the lack of posting isn't to the extent of lugnet.underground or lugnet.harrypotter. If (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jan-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: roll call (27 more needed?)
|
|
(...) A combination - or it will be. That's the plan, anyway. The entire "basement" (the level where the moat would be if I had more space to spread out) is a very solid structure, but the towers and buildings will have spaces that open. I'm (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jan-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: roll call (27 more needed?)
|
|
(...) And the module factor is basically infinitely expansible, depending on how you set it up. (...) Using the dithered colours isn't that bad, but drawing off the harry potter sets, I guess that's the only possibility, eh? I've still yet to (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jan-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: roll call (27 more needed?)
|
|
(...) Hi, Tanya! Im glad my bringing back the roll call did something. Welcome to Loyal to Castle! I am familier with the Midevil Marketplace. (i currently do not want to participate, however.) Dont feel bad about not having same colored castle (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jan-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: roll call (27 more needed?)
|
|
(...) The question then becomes which modules to build.... (...) Oh, yes, there are a few sellers on Bricklink that get lots of my money, too! And I really like the effect I'm getting from the various colors together. It's more organic than solid (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jan-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: roll call (27 more needed?)
|
|
(...) Hmmm...you want .castle to be less boring but don't want to participate in what is going on? I don't understand this, please clarify. (...) It does work, but isn't necessary if you don't want to. (...) Your buildings would have a lot of detail (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jan-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: roll call (27 more needed?)
|
|
(...) Sorry, i re-read it and i can see it was a bit confusing. heres a clarification: The MM does not strike my interest as much as the IOM did when i first discovered it. I do think it is a good idea, and is a good group idea, but i, personally, (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jan-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
