|
|
 | | Re: roll call (27 more needed?)
|
| (...) Alright, an addition already! (...) .castle has been really slow with postings lately, which was a surprise to me. Then again, at least we can be thankful the lack of posting isn't to the extent of lugnet.underground or lugnet.harrypotter. If (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jan-03, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: ROLL CALL! 78! 78! 78! 78! 78! 78!
|
| (...) Seems the whole roll call draft has slowed considerably in the last few weeks, and it's refreshing to see another rectuiting effort. But, with the goal of seventy eight signatures in place, I came up with an interesting idea. Why not search (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jan-03, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: ROLL CALL! 78! 78! 78! 78! 78! 78!
|
| Here's me... Number 51, I suppose? I was just at a site today, let me find it..... (checking browser history) Okay, I guess it was Ozbricks (Hi, you Aussies! Freezing my butt off up here near Canada, can I come visit you guys?) they've got a (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jan-03, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | ROLL CALL! 78! 78! 78! 78! 78! 78!
|
| (...) Okay, so we all know the purpose of the roll call. im taking it as my job to keep it going. 78 or more is our goal. to do this, we need more people on it. I am hoping that there is some suprise in the end. but, to make castle a funner and not (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jan-03, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: ozbricks down?
|
| (...) That was it! Thanks, you DO have to put the @ozbricks.net in there. It works, the trumpets sound. e. (22 years ago, 17-Jan-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
|
