Subject:
|
Re: Gnarlbark the Treant
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 01:22:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
443 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Bruce Hietbrink writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Anthony Sava writes:
>
> > "Treants are strangely related to both humans and trees, combining features of
> > both species. . . .
>
> In other words, these are Tolkien Ents, but TSR would have violated
> copyright if they'd named them that.
I know not the age of the word Treant, but I would bet dollars to doughnuts
that's what happened. However, I've lived longer referring to them as treants
than ents, so I'll most likely stick to it. I WAS, after all, a huge AD&D
freak in my dark ages (as opposed to my medieval ages, which is where I am
now ;)
> Very cool MOC, Anthony. I'm going to link it from my Tolkien links page.
>
> Bruce
Glad you liked it! I'm honored that you like it enough to link to it.
Thanks for the response!
--Anthony
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Gnarlbark the Treant
|
| (...) In other words, these are Tolkien Ents, but TSR would have violated copyright if they'd named them that. Very cool MOC, Anthony. I'm going to link it from my Tolkien links page. Bruce (22 years ago, 23-Jul-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
