 | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
|
Not only are the SW and HP sets looking awesome, but check out the better shots of the Monsters sets! #1380 werewolf ambush: (URL) curse of the pharoah (URL) vampire's crypt (URL) scary lab: (URL) sets look amazing! I'm dying to get my hands on the (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Jason Cicchini writes: [snip] (...) minifig head.... (Not that that would make it any smaller... but it might make it more practical/versatile); Cheers Richie Dulin (22 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
|
(...) Since the Spiderman sets are based on the upcomig movie and not the comic, you'll want to direct your complaints there, rather than at Lego. Jeff (22 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
|
(...) If it is two piece, just take the flat-top off Dr. Frankenstein and there ya go. I still like the zipper on his forehead though... -John Rudy (22 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
|
(...) It does look like a separate piece from the head. Still, it could have been made a little smaller. Frank (22 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
|
(...) I realize this, however TLC is responsibe for the Lego sets of the movie, therefore my complaints are directed correctly. I'm sure Sony Entertainment didn't say "Could you make Green Goblin's head three times the size of his body? Thanks." (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
|
(...) It isn't "three times the size of his body." I'd say it is little more than 20% larger than a regular minifig head. I can't comment on how it looks compared to either the movie or the comic, since I have seen neither, nor do I plan to. (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
|
(...) Okay, a little follow-up: A friend showed me a pic, and the minifig head looks like a pretty good representation of the character's head. Is it a bit wide? Sure, but minifigs THEMSELVES are a bit wide. Jeff (22 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
|
(...) It is a good representation, but wouldn't you rather have a minifig head, instead of this helmet thing? Don't get me wrong, though, I see some uses for it. I just think it looks a bit absurd, as well as the frankenstein's monster hat peice (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
|
(...) Have you seen the Goblin from the movie? That IS what these sets are based on. My guess is it's removable (i.e. fits over a minifig head). Kevin (22 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
|
(...) Never mind. Somehow glanced past the other follow-ups. Personally, I don't mind the size, because I'm a sucker for removable helmets, and a sculpted head in the movie style wouldn't be very useful to me anyway (too mechanical-looking to pass (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
|
(...) [sorry for the insanely long link below] (URL) what do you know! The Green Goblin just might have a mask!!! (and I was so sure before that the head was one solid element) If you espy closely @ the jaw-line you’ll be able to discern what (...) (22 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
|
(...) much time and work go into each of these minifigs, but who would even spend $15-20 on a single minifig? Magnus (22 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
|
(...) new pics on it, and Galidor still looks to be firmly in "sucks" territory. best LFB (22 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
|
(...) (URL) excellent coverage over @ ASM! Thanx for referin’ us!!! =) ?Just one question… Did Lego cast the same minifig ‘actor’ to play both -Werewolf victim #1- and the -Green Goblin- ?????? (URL) the ‘zact same face?!?!? (...) Oh, and yes… the (...) (22 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
|
Mr L F Braun wrote in message ... (...) territory. OMG - look here though: (URL) building... another bank... with the door *printed on* a JS panel. Arrggghhhh! Kevin ---...--- TOWN Lego Building contest! (URL) Hospital 2396 piece kit! (URL) Lego (...) (22 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
|
(...) Depending on the price though, from the 2nd story up this set has some good parts. (grey windows, grey log bricks etc.) The fig's always move easily on ebay too. That printed on door is inexcusable though. Jonathan (22 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
|
(...) Even worse, the printed design has images of lego pieces! Steve (22 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
|
(...) I'm fairly certain from the picture that the bank front is NOT a JS panel, but a endless-loop similar to the backdrop from the Studios helicopter set 1351. Still not terribly useful, but not really a 'brick' either. (22 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002
|
|
(...) no, I don't think it's an endless loop.. it looks to me like a piece of cardboard, held up by the Jack Stone pieces with vertical slots. The vampire set has the same sort of thing. -- Tim Buchheim (22 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002
|
|
(...) I'll be buying a bunch of those... -- Tim Buchheim (22 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
|
(...) Ooh...that's gotta be some kind of new low. "We can't give you the bricks, but here's what they look like"... ugh. -Chris (22 years ago, 16-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002
|
|
(...) Hey, and that looks like a gray Bat Helm. (URL) the most exciting castle piece, for sure, but whaddya do? (22 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
|
Hey, does anyone know when the new vampire, werewolf, etc sets will be selling?? Thanks for any info. Felix (22 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2002)
|
