 | | Re: Help! I'm being overrun by minifigs! —Aaron Dalan
|
| | | (...) Maybe I can explain...I think wolfpack are juniorized because, while similar to peasants from the earlier lines, they are more "cartoony" and specialized. While a couple of "old-school" peasants could fit in well in a number of different (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Help! I'm being overrun by minifigs! —John P. Henderson
|
| | | | | Yes, as both Aaron and Bruce said, these things are a matter of taste. Personally, I enjoy the Wolfpack because the sets provide a crest for a small but important faction in my story (named, appropriately, the Wolfpack...original, huh?)... But (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Help! I'm being overrun by minifigs! —Andrew Weiner
|
| | | | | | 1. Crusaders: love these guys 2. Forestmen/Dark Forest: just very cool, and there is a wide variety 3. Black Falcons: damn cool, and well they are the first guys i ever had. 4. Wolfpack: i like renegade type guys, and they look neat too 5. Knights (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Help! I'm being overrun by minifigs! —Richard Noeckel
|
| | | | (...) Historical-realism!?!?!?! ~They’re ‘Bandits!’ (how’s that for historical-realism) They’re completely accurate for the time. (stowed away in small packs, living on the fringe of society in old bridges) *Robin-Hood is more likely to have looked (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
