Subject:
|
Re: Correct Castle 6098 (not 6091)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Thu, 23 Dec 1999 19:01:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
888 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Jeff Johnston writes:
> David Eaton wrote:
>
> > The only other thing I'd add is that none of the baseplate castles are
> > modular!
>
> 6081 King's Mountain Fortress is a baseplate castle, but it had attachment
> points for the other modular castle sets from that era...
>
> J
Well, yes and no... It DID have a connection point, BUT it only had ONE
connection point (the left hand side looking at it straight on) so you couldn't
create an enclosed wall... The other thing is that the battlements on that side
are actually LOWER than on previously constructed castles! The top battlements
(the 2x1 grey bricks separated by 1x1 spaces) are on top of 5 bricks stacked in
6081 (so the 2x1's are the 6th bricks from the ground), whereas in the rest of
the castles, they're either 7 bricks or 7 bricks and 1 plate from the ground,
making them either the 8th or 8.3rd bricks from the ground! Also, 6081 is
already completely enclosed in and of itself, so nobody can get in from any
attached castle sections except by leaving the castle, and going in through the
main gate! Hence, I don't really call it modular... although that WAS probably
the point of putting that technic peg there...
DaveE
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
