 | | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight) —Kevin Knoot
|
| | | Don't forget the Islanders babe who was even topless, save for her strategically placed lei. (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight) —Tobias Möller
|
| | | | Actually, I never saw she was a woman until a few months ago. But I still think that the castle babe is "worse", I don´t know why. --Tobias Kevin Knoot skrev i meddelandet ... (...) girl (...) I (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight) —Jeff Thompson
|
| | | | (...) Provocative? (...) There was a paradisa babe (or a townie, in any event) with visibly defined sexual characteristics (breasts) printed on her. A yellow torso printed with a red swimsuit-looking top. LEGO's been making figures with visibly (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight) —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | (...) I thought the "red space" was a robe or cloak... Jeff (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight) —Tobias Möller
|
| | | | (...) <SNIP> (...) Yeah. Exactly. (...) I have seen that, but the swimsuit was "flat-looking". This one has curved lines, which I don´t like. --Tobias (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
