Subject:
|
Re: Smooth surfaces
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.ray
|
Date:
|
Sat, 22 Sep 2001 01:26:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
725 times
|
| |
|
|
Instead of shoving all these metastatements into files, maybe a file
conversion utility (DAT -> POV) should keep an INI file that records which
parts can be processed in this way, and which cannot.
I'm basing this suggestion on the assumption that more metastatements will
increase file size, but if that's not really the case, then nevermind.
-Mike
In lugnet.cad.ray, Steve Bliss writes:
> In lugnet.cad.ray, Lothar Teichert wrote:
>
> > I think the following is of interest in this newsgroup:
>
> Wow! Yes, I'd say it's definitely of interest! At least it is to me.
> :)
>
> > See some examples at http://members.aol.com/elferwette/LDraw/index.htm.
>
> That one example looks awesome!
>
> > Is it worth to ask Lars Hassing for integration in L3P, e.g. controlled by
> > commandline parameters?
>
> Heck yeah!
>
> Would there be any point to discussing possible meta-statements, to turn
> smoothing on and off for different sections of part files?
>
> Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Smooth surfaces
|
| My thought was that the smoothing could be turned on and off, as appropriate. That would require metastatements in the parts files. Extra metastatements will slow down processing, but not by very much. They will also increase file size, but again, (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Smooth surfaces
|
| (...) Wow! Yes, I'd say it's definitely of interest! At least it is to me. :) (...) Heck yeah! Would there be any point to discussing possible meta-statements, to turn smoothing on and off for different sections of part files? Steve (23 years ago, 21-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
