 | | Re: Minimum distance?
|
|
(...) Hi Jaco, It has been a long time and I was not able to go to the URL listed above. I have reworked the minimum camera distance concept, and have realized the wisdom of Lars' camera placement use of vaxis_rotate..... Now I just change the (...) (20 years ago, 4-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Radiosity example (F1 Ferrari) once again
|
|
"Travis Cobbs" <tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com> wrote in message news:I4vn98.21q3@lugnet.com... (...) there. (...) sure (...) made (...) spectacular (...) I have used the anti-aliasing quite extensively, although just by using the defaults I've never (...) (20 years ago, 4-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Radiosity example (F1 Ferrari) once again
|
|
(...) After looking closely at the forklift image, I think the stair-step effect is happening due to POV-Ray's adaptive antialiasing algorithm. It's much quicker to render the image at the desired resolution with adaptive antialiasing enabled in POV (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Radiosity example (F1 Ferrari) once again
|
|
"Nico Kaiser" <nico@siriux.net> wrote in message (...) Are you 100% sure about this? Usually the stair effect is caused by a lack of anti aliasing. Rendering the image at a huge resolution then doing a resize with proper resampling is more or less (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Radiosity example (F1 Ferrari) once again
|
|
Am Sonntag, den 26.09.2004, 10:46 +0000 schrieb Jan Folkersma: (...) Well, I don't have a problem with "mixed" models with LGEO elements and standard parts. The big advantage of LGEO is, that the edges are rounded a bit, so you don't need the gap (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
