|
|
 | | My other hobby
|
| Years ago, when I had all the time in the world, I busied myself by making chainmail. Lots and lots of it. I've made hauberks, chausses, byrnies, vests, coifs, mantles, gloves, and other stuff, like some crazy knit-happy grandmother. The constraints (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
| | | | | Re: New Animation!
|
| Sure! Since I don't... currently know how to upload stuff I'll just give you the whole 'Spline' bit. Here it is: #declare Spline1 = spline { natural_spline -0.20, <0,50,1000>, // control point 0.00, <0,50,800>, // starting point 0.20, (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.animation)
| | | | | Re: New Animation!
|
| That's really cool! Any potential in sharing the .pov file? Or at least some comments? RK "Trevor Hewer" <tjhewer@cogeco.ca> wrote in message news:I0G8o3.2BF@lugnet.com... (...) was (...) It (...) (20 years ago, 10-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.animation)
| | | | | New Animation!
|
| Hello, all. I have just discovered POV-Ray's wonderful Spline feature. I was mulling over how to create fluid movements with exponential curves. I did achieve some good results, but the animations are rather small and simple. It then occurred to me (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.animation)
| | | | | Re: POVRAY questions
|
| (...) it be (...) 3.5. Actually they have different setting and lighting. But I rendered the same file in 3.5 too: (URL) again the 3.6 file: (URL) have no idea what is going on. I am going on holiday now. I will post a question on the pov-ray board (...) (20 years ago, 3-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| | | | | Re: POVRAY questions
|
| (...) Ouch!! You using the same .POV file? If so why is that occuring? Could it be becuase of the code you use for radiosity? As the code was developed for 3.5. -AHui A&M LWorks (URL) (20 years ago, 2-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
| | | | | Re: POVRAY questions
|
| I have my doubts; look at this: (URL) is done with PR 3.6. There are loads of artifacts in the round grey Technic parts. Compare it with this: (URL) in PR 3.5. Jeroen "Eduardo Vazquez Harte" <eduvazhar@telefonica.net> wrote in message (...) (20 years ago, 1-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| | | | | Re: POVRAY questions
|
| (...) I say upgrade. There are no major (if any) syntax changes and 3.6 is faster. 3.6 also fixed the bug in the colors.inc file. -Orion (20 years ago, 30-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| | | | | POVRAY questions
|
| What you all think of POV-RAY 3.6? Should we update to 3.6 or keep with 3.5 or 3.1g? I use 3.5 for windows but i prefer the 3.5 for cygwin but without cygwin. What if we just work with 3.1g , 3.5 and 3.6 without having to be forced to use the latest (...) (20 years ago, 30-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| | | | | MG3k thread in .space
|
| Hi everybody I started a thread over in .space a week ago, should have cross-posted since the first picture might spark some interest over here: (URL) (20 years ago, 12-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
|
