Subject:
|
Re: POVRAY questions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.ray
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 Jul 2004 21:02:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2532 times
|
| |
|
|
I have my doubts; look at this:
http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/jeroendehaan/Renders/povray360.jpg
This is done with PR 3.6. There are loads of artifacts in the round grey
Technic parts.
Compare it with this:
http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/jeroendehaan/Renders/scaneli_kraan.jpg
done in PR 3.5.
Jeroen
"Eduardo Vazquez Harte" <eduvazhar@telefonica.net> wrote in message
news:I04FpJ.1GH6@lugnet.com...
> What you all think of POV-RAY 3.6?
>
> Should we update to 3.6 or keep with 3.5 or 3.1g?
>
> I use 3.5 for windows but i prefer the 3.5 for cygwin but without
> cygwin.
>
> What if we just work with 3.1g , 3.5 and 3.6 without having to be forced • to use
> the latest version always?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: POVRAY questions
|
| (...) Ouch!! You using the same .POV file? If so why is that occuring? Could it be becuase of the code you use for radiosity? As the code was developed for 3.5. -AHui A&M LWorks (URL) (20 years ago, 2-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | POVRAY questions
|
| What you all think of POV-RAY 3.6? Should we update to 3.6 or keep with 3.5 or 3.1g? I use 3.5 for windows but i prefer the 3.5 for cygwin but without cygwin. What if we just work with 3.1g , 3.5 and 3.6 without having to be forced to use the latest (...) (20 years ago, 30-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
