 | | Gamma correction (was Re: color, contrast and brightness problems - any idea?) —Andrew Westrate
| | | | (...) Basically, the problem you're seeing is that Windows does no gamma correction, and your two machines have different monitor gammas. (see (URL) for an explanation) To fix this, in theory, you basically have to calculate your current monitor's (...) (20 years ago, 12-May-04, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Gamma correction (was Re: color, contrast and brightness problems - any idea?) —Andrew Westrate
| | | | | (...) Here's a better chart: (URL) I found it at this site, which also has some interesting info: (URL) Andy (20 years ago, 12-May-04, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Gamma correction (was Re: color, contrast and brightness problems - any idea?) —Travis Cobbs
| | | | | So why does my monitor come in at about 1.7 on the first chart, and 2.4 on the second? I'll accept that the second makes it far easier to find the best match, but I won't accept that my estimate is off by 0.7 on the first chart. There's absolutely (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Gamma correction (was Re: color, contrast and brightness problems - any idea?) —Andrew Westrate
| | | | | (...) Well, I found both of those charts off of google, so i don't know which one is more accurate. At the risk of confusing things even more, I found another page with a similar test: (URL). I believe this one is accurate, since he give the formula (...) (20 years ago, 14-May-04, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
| | | | | | |
