Subject:
|
Re: 10026 Naboo Fighter SE Render
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.ray
|
Date:
|
Sat, 15 Feb 2003 16:28:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
737 times
|
| |
|
|
"Orion Pobursky" <bilthefish@IHATESPAMyahoo.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:HAC4JI.ByJ@lugnet.com...
>
> This one was rendered in 17 hr using the old release of the cust_inc:
> http://www.pobursky.com/images/10026Mega3.png
>
> This one was rendered in 27 hr using the new release of the cust_inc:
> http://www.pobursky.com/images/10026Mega4.png
It looks like the light is a bit oversaturated...
The reflected underside looks almost perfect, but the top side doesn't look
like it's worth 27 hours. Details get lost in the brightness. Are you using
any extra light, or only the radiosity?
Also, it almost looks like the focal point is on the reflection, not the
model?
OTOH, if you put the model on a stand, it could easily be taken for a photo
of the real thing (although my real mirrors are never that perfect :-)
--
Anders Isaksson, Sweden
BlockCAD: http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/proglego.htm
Gallery: http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/gallery/index.htm
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 10026 Naboo Fighter SE Render
|
| (...) I would have tried to add a blu sky with cloud textures. That would probably make the reflective surface of the crome parts look more interesting. It may increase the rendering time even more, though. Fredrik (22 years ago, 18-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | 10026 Naboo Fighter SE Render
|
| I rendered a picture of the 10026 using the cust_inc files with full radiosity. Since it took 27 hours to finish on my P3 500, I'm going to share the picture so that my wait wasn't wasted on just me. This one was rendered in 17 hr using the old (...) (22 years ago, 15-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
