 | | Re: L3P Options?
|
|
(...) You'll be happy to know that the coming L3P (yes, I know I've said that too often) has #ifndef's around everything, e.g.: //// Primitive stud.dat #ifndef (stud_dot_dat) #macro stud_dot_dat(L3ArgTe...,L3ArgMat) L3MacroBegin("stud_dot_dat") #if (...) (19 years ago, 12-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Raytracing a primarily black model
|
|
OK, you did that on purpose! Given the title of the folder, I've gotta ask - What Magazine? (great renders, btw) James Wilson Dallas, TX (19 years ago, 12-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P Options?
|
|
(...) You got it. 0 L3P IFPOV meta-statements are probably the way to accomplish what you want. Hmm, thinking more about it (I could just go try it), you'll probably still need l3p's -p parameter, or l3p probably won't even look at the primitive (...) (19 years ago, 12-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P Options?
|
|
(...) Sorry! I guess I didn't make my question clear enough. I'd like to substitute the primitives still, but with those of my own creation, rather than those that L3P creates. For example I think a stud looks better with a slightly rounded top (a (...) (19 years ago, 12-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P Options?
|
|
(...) Yep. -p Don't substitute any primitives in the P directory with POV equivalents ---...--- In order to have a nicer looking image some parts (primitives) in the P directory are by default substituted with POV equivalents. E.g. 4-4cyli.dat is (...) (19 years ago, 12-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | L3P Options?
|
|
Dear Lars (and anyone who can answer my questions) I was wondering if there was a way to use L3P so that it does NOT include its primitives in the final .pov file? The reason for this question is that I'd like to be able to adjust some of the (...) (19 years ago, 12-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Version 513 of my Library is available now.
|
|
Version 513 of the Library can be found on my website now, 9 new pieces have been added. As always you can find all of the changes to the Library in the included "considerations.txt" file. The address is: (URL) Anton (19 years ago, 10-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Raytracing a primarily black model
|
|
(...) (URL) only is white on red easier to render than blue on black, it will probably show the detail better in print. Thanks for the suggestions though, --Bram (19 years ago, 9-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Raytracing a primarily black model
|
|
"Bram Lambrecht" <lego@bldesign.org> schreef in bericht news:IEL8K5.36t@lugnet.com... (...) Ah c'mon Bram, don't give up so easily! Show us your secret project! Jeroen (19 years ago, 9-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Raytracing a primarily black model
|
|
"Bram Lambrecht" <lego@bldesign.org> schreef in bericht news:IEKDJ4.ro1@lugnet.com... (...) Hi Bram, The secret is: don't use radiosity! Haha. But seriously: as far as I remember the Hudson posters are done without radiosity. It can be done but you (...) (19 years ago, 9-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
