 | | Re: Star Wars mini models 1st wave render
|
|
Orion, Nice work! Excellent job of lighting in that photo. Having no shadows really gave it a sense of realism, instead of just making it seem like a bunch of models on display. Amazing what changing the spot lightsources to ambient sources will (...) (21 years ago, 6-Aug-03, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars mini models 1st wave render & Orange in part
|
|
(...) It is dark blue. In fact that's the darkest I can get it wiht LDraw color number since I used dithered Black and Blue. (...) Unfortunately no (...) I used 484. 25 seemed too dark. -Orion (21 years ago, 6-Aug-03, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars mini models 1st wave render & Orange in part
|
|
(...) Looks nice, esp. the AT-ST. Colors seem wrong on the Slave I (I think the blue should be dark blue). Missing the TIE Bomber, though. Are the cylinders for the TIE Bomber up yet? Question related to another topic: what color orange did you use (...) (21 years ago, 6-Aug-03, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Star Wars mini models 1st wave render
|
|
Well, between Donald Sutter and myself all the parts, including patterns, used in sets 4484, 4485, 4486, 4487 have been modelled and are offical or on the Parts Tracker. I got bored and made a render of the the Mini's in the same picture: (URL) a (...) (21 years ago, 6-Aug-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: How to use Mega-Pov without LPub
|
|
the post process functions do not exist in MegaPov 1.0. you need MegaPov 0.7. Gary "Trev" <tjhewer@cogeco.ca> wrote in message news:HJ5oJ6.252w@lugnet.com... (...) all of (...) lines, (...) MegaPov 1.0 (...) when (...) unofficial (...) Mega-Pov I (...) (21 years ago, 5-Aug-03, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | How to use Mega-Pov without LPub
|
|
Hello. This is my first post on lugnet. I have searched and read nearly all of the topics about Mega-Pov. I have tried for a long time to get the edge lines, but I just can't seem to get it. I put the line #version unofficial MegaPov 1.0 and then (...) (21 years ago, 5-Aug-03, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | POV torus bug fix
|
|
I have made a bug fix to PovRay regarding the torus (used by L3P in the studlogo and in some primitive substitutions). (URL) guy from the POV team mailed me about permission to use my code, but couldn't tell when it will be released. Meanwhile you (...) (21 years ago, 3-Aug-03, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with LPub and MegaPOV
|
|
(...) Are you making fun of me Kevin? =) I am NOT annoyed at all over Pov 3.1g vs 3.5. In fact I perfer 3.1g vs 3.5, because 3.5 takes longer to render for some reason. The ONLY reason I tolerate 3.5 is because of Jeroen De Hann's Ultra-Realtisc (...) (21 years ago, 2-Aug-03, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with LPub and MegaPOV
|
|
(...) Can you tell he's annoyed? That's ok, at BricksWest he made some comment about being suprised to see me with bricks in my hands. I've had a huge push on pneumatic invention and I go where the creative surges send me. Besides work has been (...) (21 years ago, 2-Aug-03, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with LPub and MegaPOV
|
|
<snip> (...) I believe that LPub is *STILL* using Pov-Ray 3.1g and MegaPOV .7. You can do two things: 1) Download POV-Ray 3.1g and MegaPOV 0.7 or 2) As Orion stated in the other post manually edit the line of code that states: #version unofficial (...) (21 years ago, 31-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
