Subject:
|
Re: Usage Question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.mlcad
|
Date:
|
Fri, 6 Oct 2000 14:09:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2366 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.mlcad, Mike Walsh writes:
>
> "Michael Lachmann" <michael.lachmann@maxmobil.at> wrote in message
> news:G1yuEK.JC@lugnet.com...
>
> [ ... snipped ... ]
>
> >
> >
> > I removed them in an early version because most of the people didn't like • the
> > scroll-bars. However I could make them optional .. will see .. maybe in • one of
> > the future versions.
> >
> > Michael
>
> That is interesting! Hmmm ... I guess I am used to scroll bars from the
> tools (Electrical Engineering CAE tools) we (the company I work for) sell.
Right, and you're probably delivering to a clientele that uses 19 inch or
bigger displays with monster resolution like 1768 x 1280, in unix where you
have more control over scroll bar width... (1) We are stuck on small displays,
my laptop effectively is 800x600 because I need to see other parts of the
screen.
1 - when I worked at IBM EDS (engineering design systems, we wrote DA software
that competed internally (but not outside the company) with the likes of
Cadence and Mentor, we were at first on vector displays, then on the IBM 5080
and successors, the 5080 had a square aspect ratio with what seemed like 1024
on a side, IIRC, which was a LOT for late 1980s....
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Usage Question
|
| "Michael Lachmann" <michael.lachmann@maxmobil.at> wrote in message news:G1yuEK.JC@lugnet.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) the (...) one of (...) That is interesting! Hmmm ... I guess I am used to scroll bars from the tools (Electrical Engineering (...) (24 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
