 | | Re: Best hardware for MLCad?
|
|
(...) Ok here are the real minimum hardware requirements for MLCad (V1.7 Release 2): - Any computer running with Windows 95/98 or NT - Harddisk mainly depends on the operating system plus arround 100 MB (for dat files and swap-space) - Graphic card (...) (25 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Best hardware for MLCad?
|
|
It will probably work but you will HATE it at that speed. (25 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Best hardware for MLCad?
|
|
(...) As I stated before, the computer is a 486 66MHz. It has 8MB of RAM. Barely enough to run Win95. As far as video and graphics cards, I don't have a clue anymore. I would like to think that I could use it for MLCad, otherwise it's probably (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Suggestion for MLCad Plug-Ins
|
|
Steve Bliss skrev i meddelandet ... (...) We'll think about it later... (...) When a (...) Sounds like a good idea - I'll test it when Real Life permits. Will LDAO also allow drag *from* LDAO to xxx? By using the same protocol you could use LDAO (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Best hardware for MLCad?
|
|
If it has 32 MB you should be OK... but OK or not OK turns on what you feel minimum performance is. CPU and memory will both help rendering performance, I suspect, as will the speed of the graphics card. note that I am guessing here. (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Suggestion for MLCad Plug-Ins
|
|
(...) Cool. Uhh, what about color? Augh! I don't want to think about that right now. (...) OK, I'll work on getting this feature added to LDAO. (...) How about if LDList accepted the dragged parts as well as supplied them? When a part is dragged (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Best hardware for MLCad?
|
|
(...) in the basement with Win95 as my OS. I'm just wondering if anyone has determined what the minimum requirements are. That would save the hassle (small, I know) of installing MLCad and finding out the 486 is too slow. -Duane (25 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Suggestion for MLCad Plug-Ins
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote in <lugnet.cad.mlcad> ... (...) displayed (...) dragged (...) Piece o' cake! I gave it an hour... LDList ver 3.6 can load a set description, containing a lot of lines like: <count> <piece number> and will limit the display to the (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Taking Pictures of Models
|
|
How do I take pictures of a model from different angles, e.g. side, front, and top? I am so sorry this is such a stupid question, but I need some help. And yes, I am that stupid not to have figured it out yet? Please have pity! ;-) Mladen Pejic, (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Suggestion for MLCad Plug-Ins
|
|
(...) a (...) in. (...) Yeah, it would be better if it was supported by MLCAD, either directly or via the drag and drop protocol or something similar. I was just thinking in terms of plugins because that's what we were talking about, and it really (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
