 | | Re: Unofficial LeoCAD parts update #17
|
|
Ha, my post certainly stirred up some folks out there! I just want to let you know that allthough I'm not a mac user I simply prefer Leocad above (for example) MLCad because I think it's simply more intuitive and works a lot faster. I know that (...) (22 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.leocad)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial LeoCAD parts update #17
|
|
(...) That would be a good thing for the life of this nice editor! Philo (22 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.leocad)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial LeoCAD parts update #17
|
|
(...) No. It started out as a viewer, but I added an LEDIT compatible editor mode a long time ago. (...) You can do it that way by putting ldglite in polling mode. In fact that's what I initially thought would work best for me. But the poll and (...) (22 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.leocad)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial LeoCAD parts update #17
|
|
(...) But isn't Ldglite just a viewer, compared to the editor Leocad? That said, it seems to have the advantage of actually working, so maybe Emacs + Ldglite would be a viable way to edit Ldraw files. Last time I tried Leocad it crashed after a (...) (22 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.leocad)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial LeoCAD parts update #17
|
|
(...) Oops, sorry Don ;o) (I am not a Linux user...) Philo (22 years ago, 26-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.leocad)
|
