Subject:
|
Re: IMPORTANT - [ldraw.org] Official Model Repository
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Sat, 12 Jun 1999 15:32:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
832 times
|
| |
|
|
At 03:05 PM 6/12/99 +0000, you wrote:
> > As I wrote you, if you're going to name submodels a, b, • c...etc. let the
> > letter have significance. a should be the first submodel • appearing in the
> > instruction booklet, b the second...etc...
>
> Do you have to have everything that is a submodel in the
> instructions, a
> submodel in the model. There are times when that doesn't make
> sense.
> If not we need to know which ones are complex enough to include.
This is a complex issue. The thing is, what is easy to click together with
Lego could be difficult with LDraw. I would say LDraw uses submodels much
more often than Lego would in its instructions. Say for example an angled
wing assembly like on the M:Tron Particle Ionizer. in Ldraw you would
probably want a submodel, but in real life you could just click it
together. So this needs to be handled on a per-case basis. I would prefer
each submodel in a model (or set if there are no models) ;) so that someone
can work with just a submodel, for example, the cargo boxes on the M:Tron
Multi Core, or the Space Police jail on the Galactic Mediator. But the
actual construction of a model in ldraw should be addressed in a per-case
basis. But ideally the only submodels would be the official submodels in
the instructions.
-Tim Courtney
ldraw.org Project Coordinator
http://www.ldraw.org
http://www.zacktron.com
AIM: timcourtne
ICQ: 23951114
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
