 | | Re: IMPORTANT - [ldraw.org] Official Model Repository —Ryan Dennett
|
| | | (...) model repository, I (...) made any TLG models (...) email them to me (...) set number as the (...) set number and ** (...) M7140-99 for (...) that it is a (...) Yes, we had, and to explain why; some people might have unofficial parts in their (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: IMPORTANT - [ldraw.org] Official Model Repository —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) Ahh, nope, I'm not. Well, not exactly. There are two different ways to look at "uninlining": one view is that it's simply removing the extra code, and restoring the original reference statement. This approach works, as long as you have the (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: IMPORTANT - [ldraw.org] Official Model Repository —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | | | (...) I would greatly prefer ZIP and/or MPD (I just thought of another idea for LDLite (sorry gyug): ZIP support). I think inlining makes it too difficult to follow the building process. About following the building process, will it be required that (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: IMPORTANT - [ldraw.org] Official Model Repository —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | (...) I am going to strongly go with the MPD download myself. (...) Hmmm.... that is a good thought.... I would go for that, since they could theoretically take the place of instructions. -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project Coordinator (URL) timcourtne (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
