 | | Re: Site changes on LDraw: Opinions sought —Tim Courtney
|
| | | (...) Tim, What do you guys think about a total redesign of LDraw.org? The PostNuke interface does make it easy for many people to edit the site--a key reason we did the CMS in the first place. But, it does appear clunky throughout and could really (...) (18 years ago, 16-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Site changes on LDraw: Opinions sought —Orion Pobursky
|
| | | | | (...) Due to the amount of time I've put into developing custom module for PostNuke I'm obviously in favor of option 1. I've become pretty proficient at web design and the use of the PostNuke theme engine so a potential contributer would just need (...) (18 years ago, 16-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Site changes on LDraw: Opinions sought —Willy Tschager
|
| | | | (...) before we talk about design I'd like to see some idiosyncrasies solved which give us webmasters sometimes a hard time. w. (18 years ago, 17-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Site changes on LDraw: Opinions sought —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | (...) Could you explain? Are you talking about software idiosyncracies, organizational process idiosyncracies, or...? I'm not -pushing- for redesign per se, I'm just bringing it up for discussion as I think it would be really cool to see an (...) (18 years ago, 17-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Site changes on LDraw: Opinions sought —Willy Tschager
|
| | | | (...) I'm talking about the PostNuke nuts'n'bolts. this kind of stuff: (URL) I'm not -pushing- for redesign per se, I'm just bringing it up for discussion as (...) every help to steamline the PN stuff is welcomed and much appreciated (where (...) (18 years ago, 18-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Site changes on LDraw: Opinions sought —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | --snip-- (...) I'm with Willy on this. Much as I'd love to move away from PostNuke I just don't think it's worth the effort right now. So long as the site is relatively attractive and, more importantly, serves its purpose properly by allowing ready (...) (18 years ago, 19-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
