Subject:
|
Re: Non-commercial clause (was Re: License Intent )
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 8 Jun 2004 17:17:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2812 times
|
| |
|
|
Dan Boger wrote:
>
> Wouldn't this problem be solved by the GPL approach, where any
> modifications made have to be re-submitted to the original library?
The GPL does not require re-submission to the original source.
> This way, yes, you can make your cool changes, and sell them, but you
> have to send the patches back to the original parts, where they can
> either be integrated or not, depending on what the PT admins think.
You don't have to send the changes back to the maintainers, you
only have to make the source of the changes freely available to
everyone, you're even allowed to charge a copying and handling fee.
The only real restiriction is that you can't control what people
do with this source code once they have it.
-Kyle
--
_
-------------------------ooO( )Ooo--------------------------------
Kyle J. McDonald (o o) Systems Support Engineer
Sun Microsystems Inc. ||||| Kyle.McDonald@Sun.COM
1 Network Drive \\\// voice: (781) 442-2184
Burlington, MA 01803 (o o) fax: (781) 442-1542
--------------------------------ooO(_)Ooo-------------------------
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
139 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
