Subject:
|
Re: Non-commercial clause (was Re: License Intent )
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 8 Jun 2004 17:34:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2833 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 01:17:03PM -0400, Kyle McDonald wrote:
> > Wouldn't this problem be solved by the GPL approach, where any
> > modifications made have to be re-submitted to the original library?
>
> The GPL does not require re-submission to the original source.
Sorry - my mistake.
> > This way, yes, you can make your cool changes, and sell them, but you
> > have to send the patches back to the original parts, where they can
> > either be integrated or not, depending on what the PT admins think.
>
> You don't have to send the changes back to the maintainers, you only
> have to make the source of the changes freely available to everyone,
> you're even allowed to charge a copying and handling fee.
Ok, yes, that was my point - you can't keep the changes to yourself, you
have to publish them, so that they could (in theory) be merged with the
original library.
--
Dan Boger
dan@peeron.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
139 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
