![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines Larry Pieniazek
|
| | (...) To which post? Your post? (...) All the rest of the thread before your post is irrelevant? I'm not sure that's what you meant to say, you may want to consider a rewording to clarify. (...) I disagree. While they may not have been the decision (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | |
| | ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines Dan Boger
|
| | | | (...) of course not. Prior to this thread being posted on lugnet. [snip] (...) Opinions voiced in a private discussion ARE irrelavent once the discussion goes public. If the owners of the opinions want to share them, they're welcome to do so (and (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) That's unjustified (as in, you haven't justified that view, merely stated it) and dismissive and not really a good attitude to take, in my view. (...) um, 6 out of 17 (see (URL) ) isn't really "mostly". It might be a plurality but it's way (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |