Subject:
|
Re: Part Voting Issue
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Sun, 16 Jun 2002 21:51:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
382 times
|
| |
|
|
Hello Adam,
yes.. i agree in a point.
It would be cool if an email would be dispatched either to the person who
submitted the part or (preferably) to the author (the email address in the
parts author line should be required). So you automatically get known that
someone reviewed your part and placed a hold on it.
Play well
Carsten
"Adam Howard" <abhoward10@hotmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:GxtCIJ.B8z@lugnet.com...
> I recently encountered a problem with the current part voting system that
> needs to be addressed to prevent future incidents from occuring.
>
> Last year(around August) I submitted some parts to be voted on. One of the
> parts had a 'hold' placed on it. That was fine. Two months ago I finally • had
> time to get re-involved with the ldraw community and discovered the part • had
> a 'hold' placed on it which prevented it from being voted on further. I • read
> through the 'hold' comment and had questions about why the hold was • issued,
> however, between the time the hold had been issued and now, the person who
> had placed the hold no longer maintained an active involvement with the
> voting process. Fortunately I was still able to contact the person and • clear
> the hold so that someone else could take a look at the part.
>
> The issue we need to address is what happens when you can no longer • contact
> the evaluator who made a comment about a part you submitted, and what to • do
> with the parts someone has evaluated when that person suddenly has no time
> to be actively involved in the evaluation process.
>
> Considering the time frame, about 8-10 months, from the time I submitted • the
> part and now, I have a strong feeling this part would have still been on
> 'hold' another year from now if I hadn't noticed it and taken action to
> correct it. I also wonder if there are other parts, currently on the list,
> that will remain on 'hold' indefinitely because the evaluator who placed a
> 'hold' on them no longer has time to continue evaluating parts.
>
> We definetly need to enact rules to make sure an evaluator's parts are
> passed to another evaluator when that evaluator no longer has time for the
> process.
> I also believe something should be done so that an email is sent to a part
> author notifing them when an evaluation is made that will prevent the part
> from continuing through the certification process. Unlike most part • authors
> I am usually unavailable during the Fall and Spring months, however, an
> email last Fall would have expedited the problem's solution and may even
> have made the first suggestion I made unecessary.
>
> I'm just throwing this out for people to consider.
> Thanks,
> Adam
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Part Voting Issue
|
| (...) I think that the email addresses of the reviewers should also be available in case the part author has a question about a comment and needs to contact a part reviewer. -Orion (22 years ago, 17-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Part Voting Issue
|
| I recently encountered a problem with the current part voting system that needs to be addressed to prevent future incidents from occuring. Last year(around August) I submitted some parts to be voted on. One of the parts had a 'hold' placed on it. (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
