|
|
 | | Re: rebuttal...
|
| Since I was appealed to in Franklin's email and post, I am adding my comments in reply to some of the posts here. Steve knows this, but it might not be public knowledge -- I do not get involved in the trenches when it comes to parts. Steve has (...) (22 years ago, 26-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: rebuttal...
|
| (...) This is my second reply, covering some side points Franklin brought up. (...) Yes, that's true. There's one from January, two from February, and 12 from March. To be exact, there are 10 files which are currently waiting for admin review, and (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: [Parts Tracker] Re-numbering "Star Wars" patterns...
|
| (...) The main reason for suspending review privileges is simplicity - I just pulled all privileges. I hope we'll get this worked out quickly, and get back on the road. I *definitely* do not want to lose Franklin as a contributor; he is too valuable (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: [Parts Tracker] Re-numbering "Star Wars" patterns...
|
| (...) Please Steve, Motivate the suspension as a reviewer. Suspension as a submitter MAY be necessary to keep control. Suspension as a reviewer clearly ressembles a sanction. What posted review justifies this sanction? Best regards, Damien (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: rebuttal...
|
| (...) I'm only replying here. I'm going to post two replies, one addressing the current issue, the second to address Franklin's charges against me. (...) I understand your position. I also pointed out to you that 'fixing' this problem would cause (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
