 | | Re: New style of part file 3941 vs. 6143 —Steve Bliss
| | | | (...) I guess it does! I've got some comments below, but for now, let's stick with the two documented part numbers. If someone wants to create these non-functional variations of the part(s), I'm ok with that. But let's not get into xxxxA, xxxxB, (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: New style of part file 3941 vs. 6143 —Chris Dee
| | | | | (...) No, sorry - the bulk of this research was from (a lot of) miscellanous parts in my spares box, and I cannot be sure of the providence of many of my made up sets, so any info from them would be near worthless. (...) Unless problems with the use (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: New style of part file 3941 vs. 6143 —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) nod, I understand. (...) Yep, that's a possibility. (...) That's what I'm wondering. Steve (22 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: New style of part file 3941 vs. 6143 —Joshua Delahunty
| | | | | (...) I was pretty well convinced, but I went and checked all the Ice Planet sets (1993 sets, the year that 6116 would have been introduced, and the year that Flourescent Orange intro'ed). 6116 would have (does) make a very convincing element code (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | | |
