 | | Re: June 2001 MOTM contest
|
|
"Terry K" <legoverse@yahoo.com> skrev i meddelandet news:GDyo23.666@lugnet.com... (...) rendered. I mean, there are many modelers that maybe haven't mastered POVRay (or other renderers) yet, but might still have good models. MOTM is more and more (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: June 2001 MOTM contest
|
|
(...) But what would be an allowable entry in 'LDRAWn'? A bmp. output of the actual original LDraw? Or include outputs or screenshots of LDLite, MLCad, LDView, BlockCAD, and others? Perhaps restrict model entries to a basic rendered output available (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: June 2001 MOTM contest
|
|
"Terry K" <legoverse@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:GE0K6s.Ew@lugnet.com... (...) For an LDraw.org run contest, I would restrict entries to models which have been generated with DAT utilities. (...) I wouldn't restrict model entries to bare (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: June 2001 MOTM contest
|
|
When I vote for MOTM, I consider both the rendering and the model. However, if there are enough POV gurus out there that can submit fairly good models with superb scenes, they could possibly take all votes away from people who make incredible models (...) (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: June 2001 MOTM contest
|
|
(...) Well, if these two are created, I probably wouldn't be voting in the model-only contest. It sounds too much like work <G>. I vote for MOTM because there's nice eye-candy and it's fun. The model-only contest implies that I have to scrutinize (...) (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
