To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / *1916 (-10)
  Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
 
(...) Hey- but I never heard back about which ones you wanted me to work on. Should I do all the rings? That would solve this: (URL) the PT says to send new versions of existing official files to you instead of posting them directly. Should I (...) (22 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: request for modification (Tracker)
 
(...) Great idea- how about color-coding the voting codes? A green "C" (or "A" if you are Steve) tells you that you've already voted. Likewise, a red "H" and yellow "N" tells you that you've Held or No-voted on the part. Votes by others all show as (...) (22 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  request for modification (Tracker)
 
Steve, I just thought of something that would be a "nice to have" feature, a modification to the Certification List page. If a person is "logged in", it would be nice if the Tracker's Certification List were to take this into account. That is, if a (...) (22 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Numbers Report
 
(...) [*SPLUTTER*!] [*COUGH*!] [*CHOKE*!] [*GASP*!] My.... *heart*!.... [**THUD**!!!] (...) Ummmm.... ("(URL) think they're the same person. Franklin (22 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: does PT FAQ cover "CMDLINE"?...
 
Huzzah! (22 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
 
(...) I don't think that it matters either. My Naval Nuclear Power eye for detail kicked in and I felt compelled to comment. -Orion (22 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
 
(...) The ring primitives are being worked on, I believe. Steve (22 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
 
(...) Hi Steve, May be I have missed something, but I need "RingX.dat" BFC-ed primitives, otherwise I can not review these studs: p/stud2 p/stud2a p/stud4 p/stud4a p/studp01 p/stu2p01 Damien (22 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Numbers Report
 
(...) I don't feel so bad that so many of your parts are waiting for admin review. ;) (...) Yeah, but those files are split between Bernd and Sascha. Who I'm *assuming* are different people. Steve (22 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
 
(...) (URL) (...) I think the only way it would matter for performance is if we decided that the *entire* library would be CW or CCW, and so rendering programs wouldn't have to check the winding direction at all. And that would be a very small (...) (22 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR