 | | Re: July MOTM is ready to go!
|
|
(...) Such big decisions! Silly castle people, can't you take turns? The vote'll be split among you all! Who do I vote for? I'm torn, Brad's cathedral is cool but Tamy and Elin and the dragon... ugh!! -Shiri (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | July MOTM is ready to go!
|
|
Hey all, Time to vote. (URL) luck to the entrants. And notice that there is a link to an additional rules page. I've decided to try a split format. A model-only contest and a scene contest. The rules are spelled out on how and what to enter. (URL) (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM Parameters question
|
|
(...) Short answer: Yes A parts "unofficial" status should not be a hindrance to its use. Similar to the use of a "mock-up" part to fill in where no official piece yet exists. If it does the job in place of a part that is not yet available, use it. (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Parts Update
|
|
Steve: (...) You create a file named "<filename>.meta" for each file named "<filename>", and put the line Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 in it (and ask me to activate the CERN meta module for the directory the files are located in). (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Parts Update
|
|
(...) OK, fine. So how do I mark the files as HTML, besides giving them an .html extension (which I've now done)? Steve (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Parts Update
|
|
(...) FYI: more files have been relisted, including a primitive file. Which immediately revealed a minor-ish bug in the code. Anyway, things are rolling along... Steve (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Parts Update
|
|
"Jacob Sparre Andersen" <sparre@nbi.dk> wrote in message news:Pine.OSF.4.21.0....nbi.dk... (...) Ah, I see it's working now. I didn't check it after Chris had mentioned that it was now working. Dan (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Parts Update
|
|
Daniel: (...) Since the "Content-Type" field in the HTTP header is set correctly, it is only defect browsers, which use extensions to determine file types, that will get in trouble. (...) That was because the files on the server were marked as not (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Parts Update
|
|
"Jacob Sparre Andersen" <sparre@nbi.dk> wrote in message news:Pine.OSF.4.21.0....nbi.dk... (...) But this breaks handling of HTML for browsers that only rely on the extension or the content-type header (Netscape being the biggest one!). Maybe adding (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Parts Update
|
|
Steve: (...) Yes. Or to be exact: If you ask for (URL).html it will redirect you to (URL) (which in general will identify the same document) (...) Yes (as far as I remember your message). Jacob (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
