To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Search Results: Stickers in LDraw
 Results 4281 – 4300 of 7032.
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: Calling all Meta-commands
 
(...) I searched through all my LDraw email archives, with key messages going back to 1999(!), and couldn't find it. So, I emailed Jacob for instructions and will get this done in the next day or so, when he gets that to me. -Tim (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.843)

  Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
 
(...) what the differences are, which is a good thing. How did you generate it? (I know your aversion to MS and suspect you didn't use MS Word for the generation :) ) Hopefully some automatic way so we can be sure all the differences are (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)  
 

ldraw
(score: 0.843)

  Re: Latest BFC Spec?
 
(...) Thanks, Orion! Would you mind emailing me the plain text, so I can assemble it on a web page for LDraw.org? We can also host the PDF you created on the server for those who prefer it in that format. -Tim (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.843)

  Re: A call to membership!
 
[XPFUT lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw] (...) I'm interested and willing. Count me in. Although I may be a dissenting voice on a number of organizational issues. Steve (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.843)

  Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
 
(...) it was semi-automatic - I used vimdiff to find all the differences, and marked them up manually. Didn't take long. But since it is manual, it's theoretically possible that I missed some - I promise, nothing was left out intentionally. (...) (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.843)

  Calling all Meta-commands
 
Hi All, As long as we're updating documentation, I'd like to create a list of the known meta-commands. The process for defining new meta-commands is completely unregulated, which is fine, but as a newcomer to LDRAW compatible CAD tools development, (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.843)

  Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
 
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney writes: hi tim, (...) could you please sort this out in more detail? does it mean that the "Ldraw.org" file format will support, say 256 colors, no longer required to put dithered colors in subfiles, "set in (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.843)

  Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
 
(...) Point taken, but I still think developers should discuss what they want to add with LDraw.org and Lugnet.cad.dev so that they don't add something that's already been added or being developed. -Orion (22 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.843)

  Re: Latest BFC Spec?
 
(...) I started creating a page for LDraw.org out of Travis' text file of the BFC spec. Should I wait, since you're adding numbers? The one Travis sent me didn't have numbers in them. -Tim (22 years ago, 23-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

  Re: Calling all Meta-commands
 
(...) Because it wouldn't be supported by LDraw and LEdit. Part files frequently include comments, so any standard option for commenting should be allowable in the parts library. (...) Some people already use COMMENT. Steve (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

  Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
 
(...) I think you're misunderstanding, perhaps I wasn't clear enough in the proposal. The leaders who set up the LSC are only setting it up, they aren't the initial members of the LSC. These people were self-selected two years ago, based on the fact (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

  Re: LDraw.org down?
 
(...) Sort of. The HTTP and SSH daemons are off-line. The SMTP daemon is still on-line. Hopefully the problem will be solved tonight or tomorrow. Play well, Jacob (22 years ago, 7-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

  Latest BFC Spec?
 
I'd like to (finally) add BFC support to LDView, so I performed a search here on lugnet.cad.dev to try and track down the BFC spec. Unfortunately, all the links I found were no longer valid. (Seeing as how the articles were 2 to 3 years old, that's (...) (22 years ago, 11-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

  Re: Ldraw Parts Files
 
(...) Optimist! But yes. I hope that the web server will be back on-line before seven o'clock (Copenhagen time), i.e. in about an hour. If not, it may be as late as tomorrow evening, before the web server is back on-line again. Play well, Jacob (22 years ago, 7-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

  Re: Ldraw.Org Spec 1.0.0 Page
 
(...) Hi Orion - Thanks for getting this up. I have a couple observations/questions... You incorporate the original LDraw spec in here (which should be included), but will we draw a distinction between original language LDraw/LEdit will recognize (...) (21 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

  Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
 
(...) Me either. Snipped the next bit because it's a good summation of the roles... (...) And thanks muchly for that! progress on overall org goals had stagnated. a good sharp poke was a good thing. <more snippage> (...) What I think Tim meant here (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

  Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
 
(...) While a noble proposal in spirit, I strongly feel we need to organize what we have before taking that radical of a step forward. Once we've defined the current LDraw format spec and all meta-commands, a standards body can work at defining a (...) (22 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

  Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
 
(...) I believe this proposal should make reference to the current steering committee, the only legitimate steering committee thus far. If it does not, there is a risk that the LSC could be misconstrued as _the_ governing body for all LDraw.org (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev) !! 
 

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

  The DOS apps (was Re: Backwards Compatibility)
 
Lars Hassing wrote: > Ryan Farrington wrote: >>I have run into this problem with Windows XP, not so much with LEdit and >>LDraw--I use L3P more often. Thankfully, there is still a Win98 SE computer >>in the house! > > In Windows XP you can open a (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

  Re: Calling all Meta-commands
 
(...) Why not force comments to be a meta-command like MLcad does with WRITE? Then the only problem you have is new files created with Ledit, and old files which will need to be converted. And Ldraw would still handle them OK. ROSCO (22 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR