Subject:
|
Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sat, 15 Mar 2003 20:51:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4522 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Dan Boger writes:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 06:03:52PM +0000, Orion Pobursky wrote:
> > > You're suggesting the community suffer.
> >
> > No, I'm saying that if anyone is thinking about adding a meta-command they
> > need to, at the very least, post what they plan to add so that the community
> > can comment and ultimatly say yea or nay. Once the committee us up a
> > running thay will take over the yea or nay part, but only after community
> > discussion.
>
> the more I think about it, the less sense it makes to me. The
> community (or the "board") could suggest names, and keep track of what's
> out there - but a "yea or nay" power seems excessive. How, exactly, do
> you propose you enforce this "nay"?
>
> I think a list of meta-commands does make sence, so people won't
> inadvertently step over each other toes. But "regulating" the
> meta-commands seems like over kill to me.
>
> Dan
Point taken, but I still think developers should discuss what they want to
add with LDraw.org and Lugnet.cad.dev so that they don't add something
that's already been added or being developed.
-Orion
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
154 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
