Subject:
|
Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sat, 15 Mar 2003 18:12:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2039 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 06:03:52PM +0000, Orion Pobursky wrote:
> > You're suggesting the community suffer.
>
> No, I'm saying that if anyone is thinking about adding a meta-command they
> need to, at the very least, post what they plan to add so that the community
> can comment and ultimatly say yea or nay. Once the committee us up a
> running thay will take over the yea or nay part, but only after community
> discussion.
the more I think about it, the less sense it makes to me. The
community (or the "board") could suggest names, and keep track of what's
out there - but a "yea or nay" power seems excessive. How, exactly, do
you propose you enforce this "nay"?
I think a list of meta-commands does make sence, so people won't
inadvertently step over each other toes. But "regulating" the
meta-commands seems like over kill to me.
Dan
--
Dan Boger
dan@peeron.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
154 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
